© 2026 WGCU News
PBS and NPR for Southwest Florida
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Trump Administration Moves Forward In Attempt To Invalidate Affordable Care Act

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

The Trump administration is going forward with an attempt to invalidate the Affordable Care Act. The Justice Department filed a notice that it supports a federal judge's ruling that the entire law should be thrown out. And joining us to talk about this is NPR health correspondent Alison Kodjak.

Hi, Alison.

ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE: Hi, David.

GREENE: OK. So what exactly is the Justice Department saying this morning?

KODJAK: Well, the Justice Department filed this notice which basically says it agrees with the judge's opinion in this case, which was out of Texas. And it was a really expansive opinion that invalidated the entire Affordable Care Act, which is a huge law. Originally, the Justice Department had said it wanted parts of the law invalidated. And so this changes the Trump administration's position to sort of saying, this entire law has to go.

GREENE: So the fact that the Justice Department is filing this notice with, you know - supporting one federal judge's ruling - does it change anything at this moment in terms of the law and in terms of people covered under it?

KODJAK: No, it doesn't change anything immediately. Essentially, everybody who has insurance through the Affordable Care Act directly - which is about - well over 10 million people through Medicaid and another 10 or 11 million through the ACA exchanges - that all stays the same because this is a legal case that is going to wind its way through the courts and probably eventually get to the Supreme Court.

So there's a lot of still legal fighting going on. There is a group of state attorneys general, Republicans, who want the law repealed and overturned. And there is another group of state attorneys general from Democratic states who are fighting to keep the law in place.

GREENE: OK. So this sets the stage, though, for what could be, I mean, a monumental decision about Obamacare in the Supreme Court once again. And I guess my question is - were they to side with the Trump administration, throw this entire law out - I mean, I know this is looking down the road a bit - but what could that mean for the health care system?

KODJAK: You know, it's really amazing what that could mean 'cause the Affordable Care Act - most people think of it as these exchanges where people can buy insurance. Most people's objections to it had to do with the fact that there was this federal requirement that people buy health insurance, and they didn't like that.

But really, this law touches every part of the health care system. It determines how Medicare pays doctors. It creates this Medicaid expansion, which many states have taken on, which has covered millions of lower-income people. It determines things like whether restaurants have to post nutrition information. It really - it sets up different health care delivery systems for hospitals. It really touches everything. And if the law were repealed wholesale, it would change - hospitals would have to come up with new payment systems. An entire section of the insurance industry would go away. It's really pretty expansive.

GREENE: Any idea why President Trump and his administration would decide to do this now?

KODJAK: You know, I don't really know why they would do this now. What became clear during the midterms was that the Affordable Care Act became pretty popular among voters - and especially things like the protections for people with pre-existing conditions are very, very popular. So politically, trying to take this law away and really upend the whole health care system could be pretty tricky and dangerous politically for the Trump administration and for Republicans who support this legal case.

GREENE: All right. That's NPR health correspondent Alison Kodjak joining us this morning.

Alison, thanks. We appreciate it.

KODJAK: Thank you, David.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC) Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

David Greene is an award-winning journalist and New York Times best-selling author. He is a host of NPR's Morning Edition, the most listened-to radio news program in the United States, and also of NPR's popular morning news podcast, Up First.
Alison Fitzgerald Kodjak is a health policy correspondent on NPR's Science Desk.
Trusted by over 30,000 local subscribers

Local News, Right Sized for Your Morning

Quick briefs when you are busy, deeper explainers when it matters, delivered early morning and curated by WGCU editors.

  • Environment
  • Local politics
  • Health
  • And more

Free and local. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

More from WGCU
  • “A Paddlers Guide to Everglades National Park” is the third talk in a series of free Calusa Blueway Paddling Trail-related programs. The talk will be at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 3, at the Wa-Ke Hatchee Recreation Center, 16760 Bass Road, in Fort Myers.
  • Nearly 49,000 people took to the streets Tuesday afternoon to take part in more than 1,200 events across the U.S. Locally, the Free America Walkout, orchestrated by WomensMarch.com, brought nearly 40 people, waving signs, flags, and banners, to the I-75 Estero Overpass Bridge. Countless drivers in a variety of vehicles passed under on I-75, many honking horns as the demonstrators protested the Trump Administration's immigration policies, the conduct of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and what the organizer contended is a slippery slope toward fascism.
  • An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press reveals that the agency allows immigration officers to forcibly enter homes to make arrests without a judicial warrant. This change reverses previous guidance and raises concerns about constitutional protections against illegal searches. The memo, signed by ICE's acting director, states that administrative warrants are sufficient for forced entry if there's a final order of removal. This policy could face legal challenges and criticism from advocacy groups. Whistleblower Aid, representing two government officials, describes the directive as seemingly unconstitutional and a significant shift in arrest powers. The Associated Press obtained the memo and whistleblower complaint from an official in Congress.